School bond election

I wonder whether the decision to make the Ark City school bond election a mail in vote will help its passage?

I assume that the school board would not have done it if they didn't think so, but I always thought you wanted to keep voter turnout low on single issue elections, especially when you are asking for a tax increase. The idea being that you target the campaign to those who might support it.

Anyway, I think the mail in vote is a decent idea if it raises the turnout as superintendent Ron Ballard suggests. My guess is that the $36 million measure faces an uphill battle. The district postponed the vote for more time to educate (campaign) the public. The Traveler online poll (unscientific) found a substantial majority opposed it.

It's tough to pass a tax increase in Ark City, which is well below the state average in per capital income. I think the jail bond vote failed in Ark City while winning countywide, and I was told the vote to provide tax money to Big Brothers Big Sister and CASA failed here but won in Winfield. It lost countywide.

Big Box

Here's a comment that sparks interest.....

"I'm not sure of the "tax break" you mention. I hear that phrase bandied about quite a bit. As I understand it the "big box" will still have to pay full taxes and not receive any kind of rebate. Only the developer will get any benefit - and that only for streets and water and such that the city would have had to be a part of anyway - to create a full shopping center and draw in other retailers.

I could be wrong, but somebody should find out for sure."

If the developer/land owner gets to keep part of the property taxes that normally would be assessed, isn't that a tax break?

As far as the city having to build and/or finance streets and water for a shopping center, that simply is not true. That's the whole argument — how far does the city go in aiding this project. I don't remember the city paying for the turn lanes, the traffic signal and the parking lot of the Wal-Mart in either Winfield or Ark City. (Correct me if I'm wrong)

Big Box development

Fascinated to see that the developers/retailers for the proposed Big Box development and shopping center north of town would accept a 1 cent sales tax increase — just for stores on that site.

This would help fund the capital improvements needed to build the center, and perhaps lessen the tax break the city would need to get the deal done.

Still not sure what the final amounts and details of the deal will be, but the fact that the developers/retailers would accept a tax increase seems to make it more saleable politically.

I certainly don't blame our hardware and lumber stores for being wary of this, especially since it comes with a tax break that will lead to the development of a big box home improvement store (likely a Lowes).

But, overall, it will provide more shopping and dining opportunities for residents, and increase the tax base. It could also bring more people to town and spur housing development, which is desparately needed. The devils are always in the details. So we'll wait and see.

Politics of development

Word is that one or two commissioners oppose the tax increment finance district that would bring a Lowes and adjoining strip center with it north of Ark City. We know that Mel Kuhn ran ads against the proposal during his campaign.

As I see it, there is an underlying tug of war here with a pro-development attitude on one side and a traditionalists, or taxpayer watchdog, attitude on the other.

The deal would essentially give tax revenue generated on the project back to the developers to finance improvements like roads and parking. While this seems like the progressive thing to do to provide more shopping options and increase sales tax revenues, there is a fear that it prioritizes suburban development and could canibalize existing stores such as Bryants and Westlake hardware stores.

Plus, there is a feel of corporate welfare to the whole thing. Who wants to subsize a big box store like Lowes?

I think, depending on the specifics of the deal, it's hard to say "NO" when this kind of opportunity comes knocking. In total, it appears a net benefit for the city, but there are costs to aiding and abetting retail development on the edge of town that competes with existing businesses.

I think the winners, politically, will be the commissioners who support the deal, especially after its up and running and people go shopping at Lowes (or whatever home supply store opens up there)

Learning English

Here's an interesting comment

"...... 400 years ago, when the Mayflower landed at Provincetown Harbor, they were greeted by Tisquantum (Squanto), who greeted them in English. He also spoke Spanish."


Then I guess we natives should learn Spanish to welcome the current wave of immigrants?

Learning English

I'm posting the following letter to the editor that ran in the Wichita Eagle last week as food for thought. I agree that immigrants benefit from learning English, but sometimes I think we judge too harshly ....

"I read people constantly commenting on Mexicans who live in this country and how they should learn to speak English. This aggravates me. When we first came to this country, we forced American Indians to learn to speak English. When we brought Africans over, we forced them to learn to speak English. We have never respected the rights of other nationalities to communicate the way they feel comfortable; we have only tried to force them to conform to what makes us feel comfortable. If I moved to another country, I don't know how long it would take me to learn the langauge and the thought of being looked down on until I did is unfair.

When you hear someone speaking Spanish, you have no idea how long he has been here or how long he may have been trying to learn to speak English. The next tine you hear someone speaking Spanish, give him the beneift of the doubt and consider that learning another language is not something you do overnight. You might also consider that if he is not talking to you, it is none of your business what language he speaks."

David Grebenik,
Wichita

Good schools part deux

Can whoever posted this comment point me in the right direction for this info. I purused the Web site but couldn't come up with the comparisons?
Thanks

"Standard and Poors keeps a webpage which ranks all schools in the US at www.schoolmatters.com . In the past year, USD471 has used a reference to Standard and Poors as a basis for announcing awards for economic efficiency as well as other awards, but they seem to not include the whole picture.

According to www.schoolmatters.com, there are 47 Kansas high schools of a similar size to Ark City High School (500 to 999 students).

Ark City High ranks 10th from the bottom in Kansas in reading (tied with Pittsburg) and 5th from the bottom in Kansas in math (also tied with Pittsburg).

Maybe some focus could be directed to improving the high school reading and math performance."