Sunday, March 18, 2012

Concealed controversy

City officials are upset at lawmakersupset at lawmakers trying to allow concealed carry guns into public buildings. As Chief Wallace puts it, it's akin to sanctioned vigilantism.

The argument that public buildings that do not have security officers or scanners are better off allowing concealed carry is a strange one. Are we now deputizing all the concealed carry holders? Shouldn't local governments have the right to decide this on their own?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Our 2nd Amendment is NOT up for Debate! It is a closed and final deal. Move if you can't handle it. Chief I'll give you a choice of your next statements. 1 get behind our 2nd amendment or 2. you can issue a written gurantee to protect every citizen you Serve.