Friday, April 9, 2010

Municipal mayhem

OK, that's a huge overstatement, but I liked the iliteration. But it's hard not to try to connect dots here. Esp. after Randy Leach, a fire dept employee and the chief for six years, mysteriously resigns and gets no kudos from his supervisors or the commissioners. In fact city officials wont even say whether he was terminated or resigned. There's employee confidentially, but there's also interest in informing your bosses - the taxpayers - of what's going on. Right now it tilts too far in favor of secrecy because people are afraid of lawsuits. But that secrecy breeds distrust, and I don't think govt. bodies HAVE to keep everything so quiet. They can inform the public about certain personnel issues if they feel there is an overriding interest to do so.

Anyway, Leach's departure occurs just after another dept. head, Gary Baugher, resigns with no fanfare, and while the city is undergoing an operational audit to see where costs could be saved and efficiencies found. AND, the city commission has been in lots of closed sessions to talk about personnel. You also have to throw in the commission's frustration at city staff for the confusing information about water billing payments and the questionable sales effort to purchase a new computer system, which made upper management look pretty bad.

To the average person is seems like wholesale changes are afoot, but nobody's saying so. I would encourage elected officials to be more forthcoming about the overall strategy and goals here. If there isn't an overall strategy, and these things are all separate incidents, which is possible, then somebody should write a letter to the editor or make more public statements about it. Because right now it appears that sweeping efforts to change personnel and organization is afoot. If that's the case, then citizens need to know WHY? Not knowing what's going on leads to rumors, mistrust, and a disconnect between the city and it's citizens, which is already a large problem, esp. in Ark City.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't think it is any of your business! Seriously if it was you would be told. I'm sure you don't go around announcing when an employee of yours leaves regardless of the situation. And just because you are the press doesn't mean it is your absolute RIGHT to know. What if there was something behind it that is really awful...would you print?? Doubt it....let it be. And I believe it is stupid blogs like this that keeps things stirred up and rumors brewing even when there is nothing to it.

John Edwards said...

Do you REALLY not know why he is gone? You should read JJ's blog more often. Someone told the reason, but JJ pulled the thread. It was not because of the audit. It was something the chief did personally and got caught.

Anonymous said...

" I liked the iliteration"

You mean "alliteration" - when the initial sound of words are alike?

Illiterate means someone who can't spell or read. Wait...maybe that IS what you meant!

Anonymous said...

and John Edwards you know that to be fact? Careful cause a lot of reputations of innocent people can be hurt.

Anonymous said...

"Municipal mayhem" would make a good editorial for the print addition, assuming the paper isn't afraid to take a stand.