Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A novice's take on the local, state and national political scenes
Me
David Allen
- Politics 101
- All politics is local -Tip O'Neil
Best sites
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(200)
-
▼
October
(37)
- Gene's money
- Campaign cash
- Arkalalah politics
- State school board
- Attack ad transcript
- Fairness
- McSanity
- Attack ad on Abrams?
- Chuck Todd story
- The Eagle on Goodwin-Abrams
- Chuck Todd
- Kansas presidential break down
- Kelley Burr story
- Abrams and AFP
- Greta education flyer
- Burr economy flyer
- Abrams flyer
- We are Red
- Burr education flyer
- I don't get this
- Oh ... my ... God
- Burr flyer- redone
- Anti-abortion forces
- Rotary forum
- Stand in follow
- The good John
- Switching shoes
- Fill in
- Sign Wars
- Boot Roberts
- Chuck Todd at Southwestern
- Goodwin-Abrams
- Bett's tanker attack
- Tiahrt on his NO vote
- Abrams taxes, push poll
- Apology
- Here tis ...
-
▼
October
(37)
10 comments:
I read the article, and you are right, voters do have a clear choice.
Kasha Kelley.
I pulled this from an online article today on the presidential race. I wonder how it differs from the criticisms of candidate Burr:
Won’t she be a great first lady?” McCain often coos when he takes the stage and the crowd settles down. "People often ask me why Cindy isn't running."
Seesm that some do like an actively involved wife. The article discusses how Mrs. McCain engaged and rescued her hubby's flagging campaing in the primaries.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081020/pl_politico/14748
I think it intended to compliment Mrs. McCain. I read it that way anyway.
Cindy has class. There is a clear difference.
No one even knows Kasha has a husband in politics. Why bash a spouse on either side? It really does not promote the issues just a mean spirit and makes Kasha look negative. That is really not fair to either side especially since Kasha and Scott are so different. Is it right to lump them as being the same. It goes both ways.
I agree with the last 'anonymous' writer. Personal trashing does no good for anyone! It seems Kasha is running a completely positive campaign! I wish Gene Burr was doing the same. It seems all he talks about is what Kasha, in his eyes, hasn't done or has done wrong. Still haven't heard what he would do if elected.
Anonymous #3:
Clearly, you're not listening because your mind is already made up. Mr. Burr will bring democratic ideals and principles to the house. He will vote with common sense and for what's good in this district. He's not tied to a single minded platform that seeks to run roughshod over the political and social landscape of this state. He'll fully fund education. He'll work with leaders of both parties to bring economic development to Cowley County and District 79. He'll work to make our state energy rich with wind and solar power's abundance here. And he'll listen to you...regardless of your party affiliation.
The clear choice is Gene Burr.
It seems as though the wind and sun as sources of usable enegy are nowhere near economically feasible or consistently reliable.
If we desire consistant power for our computers, refridgerators, furnances, air conditioners, gasoline pumps, curling irons, TVs, cooking stoves, telephones, and electric blankets, do we really want to depend on whether the wind blows?
Maybe we could bottle it up. (either the wind or the energy.)
you could bottle up all of curious' hot air
Curious, why are you absolutely, self-rightously so sure of yourself? Why does it make you SO angry if anyone has an opinion that differs from yours?
Post a Comment